A Passionate Ode to Stuntmen: Reviewing Jackie Chan’s “Ride On”

Alwyn Lau
5 min readApr 24, 2023

--

(This review contains no spoilers)

In the past, I’ve enjoyed Jackie Chan movies for mainly one reason: the action. Last week, I found myself moved by his latest instalment, Ride On, for different (yet ironically similar) factors.

The movie portrays the struggles of an aging stuntman, Master Luo (Chan), wrecked with debts, an estranged daughter Xiao Bao (played by up-and-coming actress, Liu Haocun) and a beloved stunt-horse whom he may be forced to give up in a legal battle. The film essentially sees Luo struggling to fulfil the stunt demands of various directors whilst trying his best to be the dad he never was to Bao in between fending off debt collectors.

It is noteworthy that the main debt collector is played by Andy On whom we first saw in New Police Story almost twenty years ago where he was the chief martial arts protagonist to Chan’s super-cop character. That’s how far time has flown.

Jackie Chan spars with Andy On in New Police Story (2004); they both return for another round in “Ride On”.

Anyway, for die-hard Chan fans, Ride On is one of very few in the past ten years which features the stunts and trade-mark action choreography Jackie is known for. It was joyously nostalgic to see him fighting bad guys again using cups, tables, ladders and chairs. One scene when a thousand axe-wielding suit-wearing bad guys are attacking Chan and his horse is sheer class and will surely be repeated on YouTube a million times. The outtakes at the end of the show also reveal Chan getting injured in at least one scene; imagine a 70-year old guy falling down a roof after fighting with a rocking chair (beat that, Tom Cruise).

“Ride On” is one of those rare Chan movies of late which features his trademark action choreography.

Having said that, I’m willing to bet one movie ticket that — for this movie at least — Chan used a stunt double (gasp!).

In the past, each time Chan’s character did something death-defying (like crash a car upside down or fall off a 60-foot clock tower) the camera ensures his face is visible to leave no doubt to audiences that that’s actually him (I’ve even written a “millenial’s guide” to Chan movies which discusses these stunts). In Ride On, in quite a few action scenes his face is hidden. This, ironically, resonates with the central theme of the movie which is about how traditional stunt-work (and thus stuntmen) may be obsolete given the emergence of CGI, the lack of trained people willing to risk their bodies, and changing audience preferences.

Director Larry Yang knows this perfectly well and milks it for all the destruction it causes to the reality-fiction barrier. Unless you’re in your teens and have no idea what Jackie Chan has been doing since your parents were in their teens, you would surely pick up on the fact that the story of Master Luo is really Chan’s own story. Any traditional Chan fan, like me, would have trouble separating Luo’s fictional struggles from Chan’s real-life woes.

Luo was once a celebrated stuntman decades ago but now, being old, he has trouble getting good projects and even has money problems. Except for the money part, one could argue that Chan is in a similar boat. Luo wrecked his body for his work and, as per a quote in the movie, he “fights with his life for what he loves”; Chan has broken hundreds of bones during filming and even almost died when jumping onto a tree when shooting Armour of God in 1986 (see note 1)

More poignantly, Luo throughout the movie tries hard to reconcile with a daughter who hated him for abandoning her when she was young; Chan has this exact problem in real life, too.

The broken dad-daughter relationship is explored in Ride On with the kind of depth no early Chan movie would’ve done. This, and the deep bond between Luo and Red Hare (his horse), is the reason why many audiences will find it impossible to keep their eyes dry. Apart from 2004’s New Police Story I swear I have never seen Chan’s character sob that much. With all due respect to Chan’s acting abilities, I am of the view that many of the tears shed by Chan in this film over his daughter are real (see note 2).

Perhaps this reflects Yang’s genius and is the key factor why the movie is doing so well in the box-office. Yang knows that today’s audiences want authenticity and dramatic profundity (it’s hard to not ‘love’ a movie which makes you cry non-stop), two qualities the early Jackie Chan knew almost nothing about.

Finally, a note about the horse who, although was the key attraction in the trailers and posters, remain merely the medium (not the message). All credit to Yang and Chan for weaving a story with a delightful animal at its core. This movie’s main themes (about the obsolescence of limb-risking stuntmen) could easily have been made without a horse, but there you go. Not only do you have a visual anchor for the movie (which works rather well), you also get a creative stunt-theme (many of the action scenes revolve around Red Hare) plus seriously powerful kicking hoofs.

Some reviewers said this movie was depressing. I don’t agree. It’s not a “great” movie but I think an aging action star and a creative young director came up with a good idea to showcase an issue in the Hong Kong film industry — and do so in a way which leaves audiences cheering harder and sobbing even harder.

Note 1: There are montages of Chan’s stunts from his early films sprinkled throughout this movie. Younger audiences who’ve never seen those sequences from the 80s’ and 90s’ are in for a treat.

Note 2: Ride On isn’t the first movie where Chan struggles to reunite with a ‘lost’ daughter. In the 2017 movie Bleeding Steel, Chan’s character also tries to play an important (albeit hidden) part in the life of his daughter, a daughter who doesn’t know her dad. Coincidence?

--

--

Alwyn Lau

Edu-trainer, Žižek studies, amateur theologian, columnist.